QMS/General/TBT-QMS-002

Non-Conformance Reporting

Quality & InspectionGeneralNon-Conformance Reporting

All Categories/Quality & Inspection/General/Non-Conformance Reporting

Non-Conformance Reporting

Toolbox Talk Record

Ref: TBT-QMS-002  |  Issue: 1  |  Date: March 2026
PresenterProject
LocationDate

What?

  • A non-conformance is any deviation from the approved design, specification, method statement, or quality standard.
  • Non-conformance reporting is a formal process that documents the deviation, investigates the cause, and defines the correction.
  • Common construction non-conformances include incorrect concrete strength, misaligned steelwork, poor compaction, and wrong materials.
  • Every non-conformance must be reported promptly — hiding or covering defective work always costs more to fix later.
  • The non-conformance report documents what went wrong, where, when, who was involved, and what corrective action is needed.
  • Dispositions for non-conformances include rework, repair, accept as-is with concession, or reject and replace.
  • The root cause must be investigated to prevent the same non-conformance recurring on this or future work.
  • Corrective actions must be implemented, verified as effective, and closed out before the non-conformance is resolved.
  • Non-conformance data should be analysed for trends — repeated issues indicate systemic problems in the supply chain or process.
  • A well-managed NCR system improves quality over time by capturing lessons and driving continuous improvement.

Why?

Cost of hiding defectsCovering up non-conforming work that fails later costs ten times more to fix than catching and correcting it immediately.
Root cause learningInvestigating why a non-conformance occurred prevents it happening again — the NCR system drives continuous quality improvement.
Contractual obligationDelivering non-conforming work without disclosure breaches the contract and exposes the organisation to legal liability.
Do Don't
  • Report non-conformances promptly using the project NCR system as soon as discovered.
  • Document what deviated, where, when, and the extent of the non-conforming work.
  • Stop the affected activity until the non-conformance is assessed and a disposition agreed.
  • Investigate the root cause to understand why the deviation occurred.
  • Implement corrective action as agreed and verify it resolves the non-conformance.
  • Obtain formal acceptance from the designer or client for any concession dispositions.
  • Analyse NCR data for recurring issues that indicate systemic quality problems.
  • Share lessons learned with the team to prevent the same non-conformance recurring.
  • Close out NCRs only when corrective action is confirmed implemented and effective.
  • Maintain NCR records as part of the project quality documentation for handover.
  • DON'T hide or cover non-conforming work — it will fail later at much greater cost.
  • DON'T delay reporting — early identification limits the extent of non-conforming work.
  • DON'T continue the affected activity until the non-conformance is assessed and agreed.
  • DON'T accept a superficial cause — investigate the root cause to prevent recurrence.
  • DON'T leave corrective actions unverified — confirm they actually fix the problem.
  • DON'T accept non-conforming work without formal concession from the designer or client.
  • DON'T ignore patterns in NCR data — repeated issues need systemic solutions.
  • DON'T keep NCR lessons within your team — share them to prevent repeat across the project.
  • DON'T close NCRs without evidence that corrective actions have been completed.
  • DON'T lose NCR records — they are essential quality documentation for project handover.

See also: Quality Hold and Witness Points | Inspection & Test Plan (ITP) Awareness

RAMS Builder

Generate professional Risk Assessment and Method Statements in minutes. 10 document formats, site-specific content, instant Word download.

Learn More